PharmaBharatPharma & Life Sciences Jobs
Menu

CLINICAL STUDY · NCT07133880

Compare the Effects of Nebulizer Versus Inhaler Based Therapy for COPD Using Long-acting Bronchodilators

RecruitingPhase 4Interventional

Sponsored by University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine

Condition
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Study locations
1 reported site
Study updated
19 Oct 2026
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov

Overall study status is shown above. Individual hospitals may have a different recruitment status.

THE STUDY

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators delivered via nebulizers vs. dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in symptomatic participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%) and show significant air trapping (RV ≥ 120% of predicted).

The investigators hypothesize that, in patients with symptomatic COPD, therapy with a long-acting anti muscarinic agent/long-acting beta agonist (LAMA/LABA) combination administered by nebulizer will improve hyperinflation (increase in inspiratory capacity and reduction in residual volume) and reduce symptoms related to COPD to a greater extent than LAMA/LABA therapy given by a DPI.

The study aims to demonstrate the following:

1. Compare the values of inspiratory capacity (IC) and residual volume (RV) in patients receiving LAMA/LABA by DPI with those receiving LAMA/LABA by nebulizer
2. Compare patient reported outcomes (COPD Assessment Test (CAT score), Baseline/Transition Dyspnea Index (BDI/TDI) and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in symptomatic patients with COPD receiving LAMA/LABA by DPI with those receiving LAMA/LABA by nebulizer
Full official title
Differentiating the Effects of Long-acting Bronchodilators Administered by Nebulizer Versus Dry Powder Inhaler in Symptomatic Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel group, double dummy, phase four, 13-week clinical trial with 1:1 allocation comparing long-acting anti-muscarinic agent (LAMA; Umeclidinium 62.5 μg once daily) and long acting beta-agonist (LABA; Vilanterol 25 μg once daily) delivered by DPI (Group A), vs a nebulized LAMA/LABA combination (revefenacin 175 μg once daily and formoterol 20 μg twice daily) (Group B) among symptomatic subjects with stable COPD.

The study begins with a screening visit and run-in period. Patients who are eligible and willing to participate will sign informed consent. They will be trained on the use of the DPI and nebulizer, as well as completion of the daily diary (symptom and medication logs) and questionnaires (CAT, BDI/TDI, SGRQ). Vital signs and a physical examination will be performed, and inspiratory flow rate will be determined using the In-Check DIAL. Medications will be adjusted to ensure clinical stability prior to randomization.

Baseline Study Visit 2 occurs within one week of the screening visit. Prior to this visit, participants must not have taken study medication within 48 hours or rescue medication within 6 hours of pulmonary function testing; otherwise, the visit will be rescheduled. At this visit, medical history, current medications, and adverse events are reviewed. Compliance with the daily diary (symptom and medication logs) is assessed, and participants must demonstrate ≥80% completion to continue. Participants complete CAT, BDI, and SGRQ questionnaires, undergo physical examination and vital sign measurement, and perform baseline pulmonary function testing in a plethysmograph. Eligible participants are then randomized 1:1 to receive either active drugs via DPI (Group A) or nebulizer (Group B), with treatment assignments generated using permuted blocks. Group A receives Anoro Ellipta DPI plus nebulized Revefenacin and Formoterol placebos, while Group B receives nebulized Revefenacin and Formoterol plus placebo DPI. The nebulizer is always administered first, followed by the DPI; Time 0 is defined as the end of DPI administration. Post-dose, vital signs and pulmonary function tests are conducted at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours. Participants also receive training on diary use, study drug/device administration, and medication compliance, and they begin the assigned treatment for 12 weeks with morning and evening doses as per group assignment.

Following Visit 2, patients will continue their assigned treatments twice daily for 12 weeks. Telephone follow-ups will occur at weeks 4 and 8 (Phone Visits 1 and 2) to monitor symptoms, adverse events, and medication adherence, with administration of additional questionnaires.

The final Study Visit 3 will take place at week 12 and will include repeat pulmonary function testing pre-dose and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose, symptom questionnaires, vital signs, and adverse event assessment. Throughout the study, patients will maintain daily symptom diaries, including CAT scores.

PARTICIPATION

Who may participate

Minimum age
40 Years
Maximum age
Not reported
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Only the study team can confirm eligibility. The registry criteria below are not a medical recommendation.

Full inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age \> 40 years
2. Either sex
3. Current smoker or past cigarette smoking history of \> 10 pack-years
4. Symptoms of COPD (cough, sputum production, shortness of breath)
5. Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) score ≥2 or CAT score ≥10 at Screening/Run-in visit
6. A PIFR \> 30 at screening
7. FEV1/FVC ratio \< 70% (within the past 12 months)
8. Residual volume (RV) ≥ 120% predicted (within the past 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosis of asthma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
2. Previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate \> 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia) (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
3. Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
4. Acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
5. Acute exacerbation of COPD within 8 weeks (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
6. Recent (within 8 weeks) h/o eye surgery (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
7. Uncontrolled glaucoma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
8. Known diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
9. Known diagnosis of chronic renal insufficiency (defined as a previous serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL - Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
10. Intolerance to any of the study drugs
11. Patients receiving long-term azithromycin
12. Planned surgery requiring hospital admission within 3 months
13. Currently enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program
14. Inability to give informed consent
15. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or subdermal implants)
16. Inability to understand instructions or comply with the study protocol
17. Participation in another investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of patient study registration

Medical history can be confirmed by medical records and/or verbal confirmation from patients. However, Inclusion criteria 6 \& 7 must be verified by a previous PFT report dated within 6 months of screening

NEAR YOU

Study locations worldwide

1 site

Check the individual site’s status and contact the listed study team for current availability.

The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine

Recruiting

Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States

Site contacts (5)
Tracy Walker, Study CoordinatorContactPhone: 865-305-4297Email: twalker5@utmck.edu
Rajiv Dhand, MDPrincipal investigator
Isaac Biney, MDSub investigator
Samuel Treat, MDSub investigator
Paul Terry, PhDSub investigator

WHAT IS BEING STUDIED

Treatments and study groups

Interventions

umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µgDrug
DPI Treatment

Study groups: DPI Treatment Group

Other names: Anoro Ellipta

Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µgDrug
Nebulizer Treatment

Study groups: Nebulizer Treatment Group

Other names: Yupelri, Perforomist

Placebo ( Revefenacin and Formoterol )Drug
Placebo Nebulizer Treatment

Study groups: DPI Treatment Group

Other names: Normal Saline

Placebo DPIDrug
Placebo DPI Treatment

Study groups: Nebulizer Treatment Group

Study groups

DPI Treatment GroupActive comparator
Group A: Receives Umeclidinium 62.5 µg and Vilanterol 25 µg via DPI and Revefenacin placebo and formoterol placebo (sterile normal saline) via nebulizer at treatment visit # 2 and will continue with assigned treatment and placebo for 12 weeks

Interventions: Drug: umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µg, Drug: Placebo ( Revefenacin and Formoterol )

Nebulizer Treatment GroupActive comparator
Group B: Receives revefenacin 175 µg and formoterol 20 µg via nebulizer and placebo DPI at treatment visit # 2 and will continue with assigned treatment and placebo for 12 weeks

Interventions: Drug: Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µg, Drug: Placebo DPI

RESEARCH DETAILS

Study design

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Study model
Parallel
Masking
Triple
Enrolment
72 participants · Estimated
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator

TIMELINE & MEASURES

Dates and outcomes

Study started
5 Dec 2023 · Actual
Primary completion
1 Dec 2026 · Estimated
Study completion
1 Dec 2026 · Estimated
First registered
21 Aug 2025 · Actual
Last registry update
19 Oct 2026 · Actual
Status last verified
Oct 2026
Primary outcomes (1)

Difference Between the Values of Area Under the Response Curve for Inspiratory Capacity (IC)

Difference between the values of area under the response curve for inspiratory capacity (IC) from baseline through six hours (AUC IC 0-6h) after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI OR Proportion of participants achieving improvement of \>2 points in their CAT score compared to baseline OR Proportion of participants achieving reduction of 4 points in SGRQ score compared to baseline

Time frame: From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

Secondary outcomes (14)

Percentage change in Residual Volume (RV) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Percentage change in Total Lung Capacity (TLC) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Percentage change in airway resistance (Raw) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Maximum percentage change in inspiratory capacity between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Maximum percentage change in RV between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA combination

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Maximum Percentage Change in Airway Resistance (Raw) between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Correlation of peak inspiratory flow rate with peak IC change from baseline

Not reported.

Time frame: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

Comparison of CAT scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

Not reported.

Time frame: From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

Comparison of SGRQ scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

Not reported.

Time frame: At baseline (Visit 2, Week 2), and at study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

Change in TDI in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

Not reported.

Time frame: Measured at Week 4 (Phone Visit 1), Week 8 (Phone Visit 2), and Week 12 (Study Visit 3)

Change in CAT scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

Not reported.

Time frame: From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

Change in SGRQ scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

Not reported.

Time frame: Measured at study visit 2 at week 2 and study completion visit 3 at week 12

Correlation of CAT with LF and LH change (inspiratory capacity and residual volume change) with patient-reported outcomes including the SGRQ and the TDI

Not reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) through Study Completion (Visit 3 / Week 12)

Correlation of LH with patient-reported outcomes including scores from the CAT, SGRQ and TDI

Not reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) through Study Completion (Visit 3 / Week 12)

STUDY TEAM

Sponsor and contacts

Lead sponsor
University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
Sponsor type
Other
Collaborators
Theravance Biopharma
Organisation study ID
4889

Central study contacts

No central contact is currently reported. Check the site contacts or the official record.

Contacts are provided by the registry for study enquiries. Do not use these details for marketing or promotions.

FURTHER READING

Results, documents and references

No results are posted in this registry record

This does not mean the study has no findings. Results may not yet have been submitted or published here.

No study documents are listed in this record.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data fetched 20 Oct 2026, 16:40 GMT+0530

Registry data timestamp: 2026-10-19T09:00:04

Registry content is reformatted for readability; original study text is not rewritten. Missing information is labelled “Not reported”. Records are supplied by study sponsors or investigators and can change.

ClinicalTrials.gov does not endorse PharmaBharat. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated or approved by a government agency. Information is for research awareness and is not medical advice. Data source terms · Registry disclaimer